Think of it as conversations; a little one sided, true, because they are the things I'd like to talk about but right now I can't think of anyone that I know that I would like to talk about them with. Not important things. Nothing to change the world, or improve life, or add meaning. Just things.
The false media narrative(s) must be apparent to everyone by now. For example, almost all media are calling Biden the President elect, which they cannot not know to be false. The only reason I've looked at the msm for roughly twenty years is to see what they are lying about, then go find out what the truth might be.
The difference between these and msm outlets (including goog/twit/tube/booface etc.) is striking.
Devin Nunes has a few interesting things to say here.
"It's so much worse than people imagine." Including even myself, he goes on to say.
Sometimes I stumble onto interesting speakers on Tube, only to find them removed from the 'platform' within days. It's been getting worse, numbers are increasing, and thus it's becoming more obvious.
Well, alternatives exist. I recommend people use them (parler etc.). After all, it's no coincidence that I can only directly link to Tube here, and have to put in a raw link to rumble.
A huge number of employed medical specialists know they are lying, and do so because their careers/incomes depend upon it.
There's really too much covered here to comment on any individual point. In short, everything the msm and governments are telling us is false, and known by them to be false. In the last 20 years or so, this has become increasingly blatant.
I'd love to say the current situation is shocking, surprising or even mildly unexpected. But let's face it, everyone knew this was going to happen.
I mean, he told you what he had done and was doing:
And Pelosi is on record with a parallel quote: "I feel very confident that Joe Biden will be elected President on Tuesday, whatever the end count is..." Whatever the count is, because that's totally how elections work.
The only thing that has changed here is the scale and the brazen nature of the fraud. Optics? At this point, caring about how things look is irrelevant. Don't waste too much time on this vid', unless you are lucky enough to have massive amounts of spare time, but there a a few interesting points here and there: The Pelosi quote from above is at about 11:30
An former auditor has a few interesting points to make (he's a little sweary about it).
In auditing you look for red flags. That’s weird bits in the data that suggest something shifty is going on. You flag those weird things so you can delve into them further. One flag doesn’t necessarily mean there’s fraud. Weird things happen. A few flags mean stupidity or dishonesty. But a giant pile of red flags means that there’s bad shit going on and people should be in jail.
The massive turn out alone is a red flag.
But as for doing better…
The late night spikes that were enough to close all the Trump leads are a red flag.
The statistically impossible breakdown of the ratios of these vote dumps is a red flag.
The ratios of these dumps being far better than the percentages in the bluest of blue cities, even though the historical data does not match, red flag.
The ratios of these vote dumps favoring Biden more in these few battlegrounds than the ratio for the rest of the country (even the bluest of the blue) red flag.
Biden outperforming Obama among these few urban vote dumps, even though Trump picked up points in every demographic group in the rest of the country, red flag.
The poll observers being removed. Red flag.
The counters cheering as GOP observers are removed, red flag.
The fact that the dem observers outnumber the GOP observers 3 to 1, red flag (and basis of the first lawsuit filed)
The electioneering at the polls (on video), red flag.
The willful violation of the court order requiring the separation of ballots by type, red flag.
USPS whistleblower reporting to the Inspector General that today they were ordered to backdate ballots to yesterday, red flag.
The video of 2 AM deliveries of what appear to be boxes of ballots with no chain of custody or other observers right before the late night miracle spikes, red flag.
Any of those things would be enough to trigger an audit in the normal world. This many flags and I’d be giggling in anticipation of catching some thieves.
And it isn’t that I have to do better. I’m just an gen pop observer who happens to be a retired auditor with a finely tuned bullshit detector. This is going to the courts.
When I say that the only thing that has changed here is the scale, here's a lone example that can stand for the hundreds that exist in American history.
"Johnson election theft took place in 1948, when he was running for the Democratic nomination for U.S. Senate against Texas Governor Coke Stevenson, one of the most admired and respected governors in the history of the state.
It was later discovered that one of Parr’s men had changed the total tally for Johnson from 765 to 965 by simply curling the 7 into a 9."
And somewhat later in the text...
"Where did the extra 200 votes come from? The last 202 names on on the election roll in Box 13 were in a different color ink from the rest of the names, the names were in alphabetical order, and they were all in the same handwriting. When Caro was researching his book, he secured a statement from Luis Salas, an election judge in Jim Wells County, who acknowledged the fraud and confessing his role in it."
At least in America there is a reasonably clear choice on offer in this specific election. Here in the UK the situation has developed to the point where it visibly and obviously makes no difference where the X goes on the ballot, the people will get the merely a slightly different version of the same thing. That may change, but is unlikely to change fast enough.
History continues to unfold according to the scripts already written, but remember that causality runs in one direction only and nothing is settled until the present becomes the past.
Billed as satire, but these people - individually and as groups - are entirely serious and acting to 'muster their forces' and force their dreams to be our nightmares.
It's not a conspiracy theory when they tell you what they are doing.
Harrison Bergeron is a short story by Kurt Vonnegut that I've seen mentioned several times recently, including here (fairly randomly as this is simply the latest place I saw the story mention and discussed):
And here's a link to the story itself: http://tnellen.com/cybereng/harrison.html
It's a short read, and not desperately subtle. The underlying theme is those that believe everyone should be made equal do not have anyone's best interests at heart, coupled with the idea that the innately superior will always rise above any amount of handicapping and therefore must be ended by the equalizers.
Whoever does the deciding is obviously motivated to disadvantage everybody else so that they themselves are and remain advantaged. This is how this philosophy has always played out when implemented in reality. It is no coincidence that any implementation of a plan to pick out any group deemed to be disadvantaged and rise them up always ends in that group being further disadvantaged.
On what may seem to be an entirely different topic, and while I'm in the mood for sharing things, here's something rather more interesting (in the sense of being rather less obvious and therefore rather more worth your time). There are roughly a dozen in this sequence and each is short and to the point.
I just spent a little time looking around for a transcript of these, for those who read faster than people speak, but can't find one in a reasonable amount of time and don't have time to do that work. Pity, but there we are.
